The Capital Budget Committee engaged in a rigorous debate during their Thursday evening session, ultimately turning down a proposal for a multimillion-dollar roof upgrade at Martinson Elementary School. The central conflict focused on the selection of TPO (Thermoplastic Polyolefin) plastic roofing over the more traditional and less expensive EPDM (rubber) alternative. Chair Jack Griffin presented data showing that while TPO is touted for its environmental benefits, the annual cost of the proposed system reached over $87,000, compared to just $28,000 for EPDM. Griffin noted that parts of the existing school roof have lasted since 1963, arguing, The proofs in the pudding that EPDM last a long time because we have it up there already.

Bonnie McCarthy expressed deep reservations about the $8 million price tag and the push for newer technology that may not match the durability of traditional materials. McCarthy compared the situation to a family purchase, stating, This is maybe not the time for an $8 million price tag when EPDM seems to work... I feel like we're paying four times as much for a roof because it's good for the environment. She further raised concerns regarding the town's maintenance track record, noting that several other elementary schools and the high school have looming infrastructure needs that could be jeopardized by overspending on a single project.

Offering a different perspective, Linda Walsh shared her research into the long-term energy savings associated with white TPO roofs, which reflect summer heat. Walsh explained, If I expect high cooling cost but want to reduce heat gain in summer, a good quality TPO with strong seam welding and reflectibility could outworth the extra cost. However, the committee remained skeptical that energy savings would ever offset the nearly $6 million price difference. Motion Made by Jack Griffin to vote on Article 7 regarding the Martinson Elementary School roof. Vote Failed 1-3.

The committee also reviewed the condition of the Department of Public Works vehicle fleet, specifically examining photographs of rusted frames and failed emissions systems on four aging vehicles. Dean Scribner questioned the escalating costs of municipal projects, particularly the balance between material and labor. Scribner argued, Those items aren't even material costs. They're all labor. So, when they give an estimate of 5 million. Those are the kinds we should scrutinize. Labor is costing us way more than a car. Despite the failed roof vote, the committee expressed a desire to see more fiscally conservative proposals that prioritize proven durability over experimental technology. The meeting was adjourned at 6:54 PM.